How to calculate the tax burden. Tax burden coefficient by type of economic activity Tax burden coefficient by industry

The so-called Concept of the planning system for on-site tax audits was approved by order of the Federal Tax Service of Russia dated May 30, 2007 No. MM-3-06/333. It allows you to understand to what extent your business is at risk of being subject to an on-site audit by tax authorities. One of the main criteria is the tax burden by type economic activity. In mid-May 2018, the Russian Tax Service published updated indicators of the tax burden by type of economic activity for 2017. We provide a complete list of them in this review (can be downloaded) so that each company (IP) can compare them with its own value.

Composition of activities

Traditionally, indicators of the tax burden by type of economic activity are fixed in Appendix No. 3 to the mentioned order. Now - for 2017 (the Federal Tax Service updates them annually). The document deals with enlarged areas of activity according to the OKVED-2 classifier. Look for the one that best suits your field.

Types of indicators

Note that the coefficients of tax burden by type of economic activity in the Concept on-site inspections The Federal Tax Service is always presented in tabular form. And there are 2 types of them:

Please note that the values ​​of the tax burden by type of economic activity for 2017 are shown as percentages.

The tax burden is the ratio of taxes (including personal income tax) and fees according to the official statistical reporting of the Federal Tax Service of Russia to the turnover of organizations according to Rosstat, multiplied by 100%.

Type of economic activity (according to OKVED-2) Period 2017
TOTAL 10,8 3,6
Agriculture, forestry, hunting, fishing, fish farming - total 4,3 5,5
crop and livestock farming, hunting and provision of related services in these areas 3,5 5,4
forestry and logging 7,5 6,8
fishing, fish farming 7,9 5,5
Mining - total 36,7 1,8
extraction of fuel and energy minerals - total 45,4 1,0
extraction of mineral resources, except fuel and energy 18,8 4,1
Manufacturing industries – total 8,2 2,2
production of food, beverages, tobacco products 28,2 2,4
production of textiles, clothing 8,1 4,2
production of leather and leather products 7,9 4,7
wood processing and production of wood and cork products, except furniture, production of straw products and wicker materials 2,0 3,6
production of paper and paper products 4,4 1,8
printing and copying activities 9,2 4,3
production of coke and petroleum products 5,1 0,2
production of chemicals and chemical products 1,9 2,4
production medicines and materials used for medical purposes 6,9 3,0
production of rubber and plastic products 6,3 2,6
production of other non-metallic mineral products 8,9 3,5
metallurgical production and production of finished metal products, except machinery and equipment 4,4 2,4
production of machinery and equipment, not included in other groups 8,8 3,9
production of electrical equipment, production of computers, electronic and optical products 9,9 4,3
production of computers, electronic and optical products 12,5 5,3
production of electrical equipment 6,7 3,0
production of other Vehicle and equipment 4,7 4,8
production of motor vehicles, trailers and semi-trailers 5,1 1,7
Providing electricity, gas and steam; air conditioning – total 6,8 2,4
generation, transmission and distribution of electricity 8,1 2,2
production and distribution of gaseous fuels 1,3 1,4
production, transmission and distribution of steam and hot water; air conditioning 6,5 4,5
Water supply, sanitation, organization of waste collection and disposal, activities and elimination of pollution - total 8,4 4,8
Construction 10,2 4,3
Wholesale and retail trade; repair of vehicles and motorcycles – total 3,2 1,2
wholesale and retail trade motor vehicles and motorcycles and their repair 2,7 1,1
wholesale trade, except wholesale trade vehicles and motorcycles 3,1 0,9
retail trade, except trade in motor vehicles and motorcycles 3,6 2,2
Activities of hotels and enterprises Catering- Total 9,5 5,7
Transportation and storage – total 6,8 4,8
activity railway transport: intercity and international passenger and freight transportation 8,5 6,8
pipeline transport activities 4,5 2,1
water transport activities 9,3 4,1
air and space transport activities neg. 3,0
postal and courier activities 14,4 11,6
Activities in the field of information and communication - total 16,4 5,2
Operations activities with real estate 21,3 6,3
Administrative activities and related additional services 15,4 9,2

According to the Federal Tax Service, the average safe share of deductions in Russia for the 3rd quarter of 2017 is 87.9%. The figure increased compared to the 2nd quarter: then it was 87.8%. However, compared to the beginning of the year, the figure has decreased. In the 1st quarter, the Russian average share of safe deductions was 88.5%.

Inspectors do not use the average data for Russia in practice. We need to focus on regional indicators. It is they who will be guided by the office when processing your declaration for the 3rd quarter of 2017.

We present the safe share of deductions by region of Russia. The calculation was carried out on the basis of form 1-VAT from the website of the Federal Tax Service.

If the company’s data is higher than the data for the region, tax authorities will be interested in the organization. Demands for clarification, commissions, and even the appointment of on-site inspections are possible. Previously, tax officials openly stated this in a letter from the Federal Tax Service of Russia dated July 17, 2013 No. AS-4-2/12722. But it was canceled (letter of the Ministry of Finance of Russia dated March 21, 2017 No. ED-4-15/5183). But experts say that there will no longer be tax commissions in the form we are familiar with, only legalization commissions will remain tax base for payment wages and insurance premiums. Their tasks and methods of work are fixed.

Sample explanations about the share of VAT deductions.

Safe share of VAT deductions in Russian regions (in%, for the 3rd quarter of 2017)

Region

Share of deductions, %

Region

Share of deductions, %

Altai region

Primorsky Krai

Amur region

Pskov region

Arhangelsk region

Republic of Adygea

Astrakhan region

Altai Republic

Belgorod region

Republic of Bashkortostan

Bryansk region

The Republic of Buryatia

Vladimir region

The Republic of Dagestan

Volgograd region

The Republic of Ingushetia

Vologda Region

Republic of Kalmykia

Voronezh region

Republic of Karelia

Moscow city

Komi Republic

City of Saint Petersburg

Republic of Crimea

City of Sevastopol

Mari El Republic

Jewish Autonomous Region

The Republic of Mordovia

Transbaikal region

Republic of North Ossetia-Alania

Ivanovo region

Republic of Tatarstan

Irkutsk region

Tyva Republic

Kabardino-Balkarian Republic

The Republic of Khakassia

Kaliningrad region

The Republic of Sakha (Yakutia)

Kaluga region

Rostov region

Kamchatka Krai

Ryazan Oblast

Karachay-Cherkess Republic

Samara Region

Kemerovo region

Saratov region

Kirov region

Sakhalin region

Kostroma region

Sverdlovsk region

Krasnodar region

Smolensk region

Krasnoyarsk region

Stavropol region

Kurgan region

Tambov Region

Kursk region

Tver region

Leningrad region

Tomsk region

Lipetsk region

Tula region

Magadan Region

Tyumen region

Moscow region

Udmurt republic

Murmansk region

Ulyanovsk region

Nenets autonomous region

Khabarovsk region

Nizhny Novgorod Region

Khanty-Mansiysk Autonomous Okrug - Ugra

Novgorod region

Chelyabinsk region

Novosibirsk region

Chechen Republic

Omsk region

Chuvash Republic

Orenburg region

Chukotka Autonomous Okrug

Oryol Region

Yamalo-Nenets Autonomous Okrug

Penza region

Yaroslavl region

Perm region

Tax burden by type of economic activity in 2017— data on the tax burden published by the Federal Tax Service of Russia, on the basis of which the tax service determines who will be audited. Tax burden data is published annually in Appendix 3 to.

Here are the data for 2016, which was published in May 2017.

Data on the tax burden for 2017 (published in May 2018) at the link:

A comment

The tax burden by type of economic activity is calculated annually by the Federal tax service Russian Federation(Federal Tax Service of the Russian Federation) and is published in Appendix 3 to.

The tax burden is used by the Federal Tax Service of the Russian Federation as one of the criteria for assigning a visiting tax audit. Thus, if the actual tax burden of a taxpayer is significantly lower than the industry average, then the tax authority considers this as a suspicious sign and may conduct a tax audit (see).

Analysis of the tax burden includes a comparison of the tax indicators of the organization (taxpayer) with the indicators of other companies in the industry or the relevant market.

In 2017, the tax burden for 2016 is known. The fact is that the tax burden is calculated after processing tax returns and financial statements per calendar year. Tax returns and the Federal Tax Service receives financial statements for the calendar year by the end of March of the next year. Then the Federal Tax Service of the Russian Federation processes this data and by the beginning of May of the next year publishes the Tax burden by type of economic activity for the calendar year (for example, in May 2017 the tax burden for 2016 is published).

Tax burden by type of economic activity for 2016*

Type of economic activity year 2014** 2015** 2016**
TOTAL 9,8 9,7 9,6
Agriculture, hunting and forestry 3,4 3,5 3,5
Fishing, fish farming 6,2 6,5 7,7
Mining
including:
38,5 37,9 32,3
extraction of fuel and energy minerals 42,6 41,5 35,6
extraction of mineral resources, except fuel and energy 8,3 11,3 11,9
Manufacturing industries
including:
7,1 7,1 7,9
production of food products, including beverages, and tobacco 19,4 18,2 19,7
textile and clothing production 8,1 7,8 7,7
production of leather, leather goods and footwear production 6,3 6,2 7,3
wood processing and manufacture of wood and cork products, except furniture 3,9 2,8 2,2
production of cellulose, wood pulp, paper, cardboard and products made from them 2,8 3,5 4,3
publishing and printing activities, replication of recorded media 13,3 13,4 11,6
production of coke and petroleum products 3,4 2,6 4,7
chemical production 3,2 4,2 3,5
production of rubber and plastic products 5,6 5,6 6,0
production of other non-metallic mineral products 8,0 8,6 8,6
metallurgical production and production of finished metal products 3,8 4,5 4,3
production of machinery and equipment 11,7 12,9 13,7
production of electrical equipment, electronic and optical equipment 10,9 11,2 11,1
production of vehicles and equipment 6,0 6,0 5,2
other production 5,4 4,3 4,0
Production and distribution of electricity, gas and water
including:
4,8 5,4 6,1
production, transmission and distribution of electrical energy 4,9 5,7 6,4
production and distribution of gaseous fuels 2,7 1,9 3,3
production, transmission and distribution of steam and hot water (thermal energy) 5,2 5,6 4,7
Construction 12,3 12,7 10,9
Wholesale and retail; repair of vehicles, motorcycles, household products and personal items
including:
2,6 2,7 2,8
trade in motor vehicles and motorcycles, their Maintenance and repairs 2,2 2,8 2,4
wholesale trade, including trade through agents, except trade in motor vehicles and motorcycles 2,4 2,4 2,6
retail trade, except trade in motor vehicles and motorcycles; repair of household products and personal items 3,6 3,7 3,7
Hotels and restaurants 9,0 9,0 9,5
Transport and communications
including:
7,8 7,3 7,2
railway transport activities 9,5 10,2 8,4
transportation via pipelines 3,5 1,7 3,2
water transport activities 11,1 13,6 13,1
air transport activities 2,9 1,4 neg.
connection 12,9 12,8 12,6
Real estate transactions, rental and provision of services 17,5 17,2 15,4
Provision of other utility, social and personal services
including:
25,8 25,6 23,4
activities for organizing recreation and entertainment, culture and sports 29,1 29,1 25,6

* - Calculation was made taking into account income tax revenues individuals

** - Calculation for 2006, 2010-2016. made without taking into account revenues from the unified social tax and insurance contributions for compulsory pension insurance

When selecting organizations for an on-site tax audit, Federal Tax Service specialists evaluate their activities according to certain criteria. For each of them there is threshold value. If a company's score on this criterion goes beyond the threshold, then its chances of becoming a candidate for an on-site audit increase. In total there are more than 40 such criteria, but regarding VAT for tax authorities the main criterion is share of VAT deductions.

How to assess whether an organization pays enough value added tax? After all, absolute numbers in this regard are completely uninformative. The amount of tax depends on a combination of factors, including the type of activity, profitability, markup, seasonality and many others, including the general economic situation in the country. Therefore, the wording of the question “ How much VAT should I pay so that the tax authorities do not want to come with an audit? "is itself incorrect.

It is much more correct to ask the question about the share of deductions in total amount accrued VAT, because it is this indicator that tax authorities pay attention to. Officially, it is called the share of VAT deductions in the calculated amount of VAT on taxable items.

For Russian Federation threshold value of this indicator as of 01.11.2019 amounts to

Information on the safe percentage of deductions by region— these are the numbers the local tax office focuses on when checking.

For Moscow indicator threshold value as of 01.11.2019 amounts to

Calculation of the share of VAT deductions

What does this indicator mean and how is it calculated? This is nothing more than a percentage of VAT deductions in the amount of accrued tax. To calculate it, you need only two values, which can be found in section 3. This is line 190 (VAT deductible) and line 118 (VAT accrued).

The indicator is calculated using the following formula:

VAT deductible / VAT accrued * 100%

In order to see the dynamics of this indicator, it is better to take the relevant data from the last four declarations.

The result of the calculation will be a percentage value corresponding to the share of VAT deductions in the total amount of accrued tax. In other words, this value shows what percentage of the accrued VAT the company claims to deduct. He is the one who will be compared tax authorities with a threshold indicator in order to draw a conclusion about the degree of tax risks of the company for VAT. If the proportion of VAT deductions according to the taxpayer’s declaration is greater, then this immediately attracts the attention of tax inspectors.

An example of calculating the safe amount of VAT deduction

Suppose for reporting period a taxpayer from Moscow paid VAT in the amount 100 000 rubles

It is impossible to say whether this is a lot or a little for this organization. But the picture becomes clearer if we calculate the share of VAT deductions:

According to the company’s declaration, for the specified period the amount of calculated VAT, taking into account the restored amounts 1 500 000 rubles ().
Tax deduction for the same period amounted to 1 400 000 rubles ().
Substituting these figures into the above formula, we find that the share of VAT deductions in the amount of accrued tax in the period under review was
1 400 000 / 1 500 000 = 93,33% .
This is more than the threshold value 88,76% for Moscow (as of November 1, 2019), which means the tax office has a reason to take the taxpayer "on a pencil".

What should be the amount of VAT in the considered example for Moscow, so as not to attract increased attention from tax authorities?

Based on the criteria used by the Federal Tax Service, the company in our example needs to pay at least 168,600 rubles VAT, so as not to leave the “safe” zone.

What are the consequences of exceeding the threshold value?

Obviously, verification will not knock on your door as soon as the specified indicator leaves the “safe” zone. After all, as mentioned above, there are four dozen criteria for assessing tax risks. This is exactly why the fact that the share of VAT deductions is in the “safe” zone in no way guarantees the lack of interest of the Federal Tax Service in the taxpayer.

Thus, if the share of VAT deductions has gone beyond the threshold value, we can assume that the scales have tilted slightly towards an on-site tax audit of your company. However, you should not be afraid of this, because if the business is conducted honestly, then the entrepreneur, director or accountant always has something to object to the claims of the Federal Tax Service employees.

Safe VAT deduction by region

Information about safe share of VAT deduction for the fourth quarter of 2019 can be calculated according to the tax report 1-VAT.

We have already calculated all the data and summarized in one table:

Safe share of deductions as of 11/01/2019 Safe share of deductions as of 08/01/2019 Safe share of deductions as of 05/01/2019 Safe share of deductions as of 02/01/2019
RUSSIAN FEDERATION 87,39% 86,93% 86,10% 88,05%
including:
Central Federal District 89,26% 88,76% 88,48% 89,51%
Belgorod region 91,63% 91,68% 92,00% 92,75%
Bryansk region 90,11% 88,89% 86,69% 92,97%
Vladimir region 85,34% 85,73% 85,73% 87,45%
Voronezh region 92,93% 92,91% 93,53% 92,41%
Ivanovo region 92,56% 92,23% 92,36% 94,08%
Kaluga region 90,01% 89,90% 90,03% 89,23%
Kostroma region 86,08% 85,73% 87,83% 89,76%
Kursk region 89,94% 91,35% 91,74% 91,91%
Lipetsk region 104,42% 105,42% 106,71% 109,05%
Moscow region 89,04% 88,74% 88,99% 89,85%
Oryol Region 92,97% 92,55% 93,47% 94,65%
Ryazan Oblast 83,23% 83,81% 85,76% 85,14%
Smolensk region 95,32% 94,64% 94,07% 95,27%
Tambov Region 96,39% 97,26% 99,12% 102,84%
Tver region 91,63% 91,66% 92,80% 94,39%
Tula region 96,85% 97,55% 96,99% 97,47%
Yaroslavl region 89,16% 89,80% 87,41% 90,74%
Moscow city 88,76% 88,08% 87,62% 88,66%
Northwestern Federal District 87,18% 87,02% 86,96% 88,18%
Republic of Karelia 74,88% 76,40% 80,56% 84,84%
Komi Republic 76,38% 76,42% 76,04% 79,07%
Arhangelsk region 77,44% 83,27% 78,50% 92,10%
Vologda Region 98,10% 99,44% 99,78% 96,26%
Kaliningrad region 60,35% 60,30% 61,33% 63,58%
Leningrad region 86,10% 86,65% 88,89% 88,67%
Murmansk region 121,95% 103,07% 84,41% 92,32%
Novgorod region 95,84% 94,71% 97,65% 94,57%
Pskov region 89,14% 88,10% 90,66% 94,10%
city ​​of St. Petersburg 87,73% 87,57% 87,56% 88,73%
Nenets Autonomous Okrug 147,56% 140,38% 154,60% 126,77%
North Caucasian Federal District 89,18% 89,60% 85,87% 90,57%
The Republic of Dagestan 83,16% 84,26% 84,24% 84,89%
The Republic of Ingushetia 93,28% 93,81% 93,30% 99,02%
Kabardino-Balkarian Republic 86,70% 87,95% 90,48% 94,21%
Karachay-Cherkess Republic 91,81% 91,75% 92,56% 94,31%
Republic of North Ossetia-Alania 88,48% 89,38% 89,15% 87,62%
Chechen Republic 97,47% 100,11% 66,44% 100,40%
Stavropol region 88,75% 88,81% 88,72% 89,48%
Southern Federal District 90,10% 89,76% 90,31% 91,59%
Republic of Adygea 85,74% 86,11% 86,69% 86,78%
Republic of Kalmykia 80,22% 82,45% 87,15% 81,10%
Republic of Crimea 85,70% 86,23% 86,95% 89,73%
Krasnodar region 90,74% 90,76% 91,30% 93,21%
Astrakhan region 65,85% 64,39% 60,28% 58,65%
Volgograd region 90,70% 88,23% 89,15% 90,69%
Rostov region 92,72% 92,84% 93,70% 94,07%
city ​​of Sevastopol 81,26% 81,25% 81,10% 82,99%
Volga Federal District 86,26% 85,60% 81,02% 86,79%
Republic of Bashkortostan 91,04% 89,38% 90,28% 90,53%
Mari El Republic 88,36% 88,19% 89,24% 90,19%
The Republic of Mordovia 92,38% 92,81% 93,27% 90,54%
Republic of Tatarstan 87,88% 87,56% 87,38% 88,48%
Udmurt republic 79,95% 79,29% 79,71% 81,95%
Chuvash Republic 83,60% 84,24% 85,56% 85,71%
Kirov region 87,05% 87,45% 88,82% 87,36%
Nizhny Novgorod Region 88,99% 88,96% 63,08% 88,59%
Orenburg region 71,29% 69,82% 70,75% 73,44%
Penza region 91,13% 90,95% 90,54% 91,12%
Perm region 82,01% 80,64% 80,76% 82,69%
Samara Region 83,63% 83,27% 83,77% 85,13%
Saratov region 84,06% 83,23% 83,56% 85,61%
Ulyanovsk region 91,22% 91,09% 91,05% 91,37%
Ural Federal District 77,92% 77,35% 76,67% 79,32%
Kurgan region 85,43% 84,69% 86,21% 88,07%
Sverdlovsk region 91,64% 91,50% 91,20% 91,40%
Tyumen region 83,81% 84,28% 84,55% 84,61%
Chelyabinsk region 91,11% 90,80% 90,76% 92,32%
Khanty-Mansi Autonomous Okrug - Yugra 58,70% 56,89% 57,34% 62,57%
Yamalo-Nenets Autonomous Okrug 64,39% 65,61% 61,99% 63,94%
Siberian Federal District 84,16% 84,22% 84,50% 85,56%
Altai Republic 90,52% 91,58% 93,17% 94,00%
Tyva Republic 77,99% 76,66% 82,10% 73,53%
The Republic of Khakassia 89,66% 89,94% 90,09% 92,13%
Altai region 90,16% 89,74% 89,67% 90,15%
Krasnoyarsk region 78,06% 79,53% 80,66% 83,04%
Irkutsk region 77,06% 77,21% 77,83% 78,88%
Kemerovo region - Kuzbass 90,77% 89,43% 88,67% 88,95%
Novosibirsk region 89,51% 89,55% 89,83% 90,25%
Omsk region 88,27% 88,51% 89,06% 90,73%
Tomsk region 77,34% 77,03% 76,51% 77,02%
Far Eastern Federal District 96,97% 95,85% 94,96% 95,86%
The Republic of Buryatia 90,62% 91,55% 89,74% 89,66%
The Republic of Sakha (Yakutia) 90,67% 89,68% 86,76% 87,16%
Primorsky Krai 94,38% 93,25% 93,19% 94,23%
Khabarovsk region 92,91% 91,97% 91,61% 94,62%
Amur region 130,35% 127,83% 131,40% 124,68%
Kamchatka Krai 90,25% 89,69% 82,32% 85,99%
Magadan Region 97,54% 98,80% 95,29% 91,23%
Sakhalin region 98,33% 96,99% 93,92% 89,72%
Transbaikal region 89,50% 87,29% 87,42% 90,06%
Jewish Autonomous Region 86,78% 90,63% 105,64% 112,00%
Chukotka Autonomous Okrug 120,31% 115,38% 111,56% 110,23%
BAIKONUR 93,39% 71,83% 74,90% 73,78%

The current size of the average share of deductions can be calculated according to the 1-VAT report published on the website of the Federal Tax Service of Russia nalog.ru. The safe share of VAT deductions is calculated using the formula: Share of VAT deductions by region = Amount of VAT deductions (column 2100.1 of the 1-VAT report by region) / Tax accrued (column 1100.1 of the 1-VAT report by region) x 100%

For example, the figures for Moscow from the 1-VAT report as of 08/01/2019: 11 958 456 461 / 10 532 692 655 * 100% = 88,08%

Reason for checking

Exceeding the above values safe share deductions are fraught with an audit by the tax office. The Federal Tax Service explains this in its letter dated July 17, 2013 No. AS-4-2/12722.

The tax burden is an indicator calculated as the ratio of the amount of taxes paid by the taxpayer to the amount of his revenue according to the financial statements, multiplied by 100%. Each organization can calculate it independently using the formula:

Tax authorities, in turn, determine the tax burden coefficient by type of economic activity, i.e., a certain average value for each industry (clause 1 of the Publicly Available Criteria for Assessing GNP Risks, approved by Order of the Federal Tax Service of Russia dated May 30, 2007 N MM-3-06/333 @). And if it turns out that the level of workload in a particular organization is lower than the industry average, this may become the basis for including the company in the on-site inspection plan (clause 1, section 4 of the Concept of the GNP planning system, approved by Order of the Federal Tax Service of Russia dated May 30, 2007 N MM -3-06/333@, Letter of the Ministry of Finance of Russia dated June 23, 2016 N 03-02-08/36472). After all, this means that the organization pays less taxes (their share is a smaller part of its revenue) than other companies operating in the same field. Which raises certain suspicions among regulatory authorities.

As can be seen from the formula, insurance premiums are not included in the amount of taxes paid for the year (Letter of the Federal Tax Service of Russia dated March 22, 2013 N ED-3-3/1026@).

Indicators of the industry average tax burden

The tax burden by type of economic activity is in free access. The Federal Tax Service publishes them at the end of each year on its website no later than May 5 of the following year (clause 6 of Order of the Federal Tax Service of Russia dated May 30, 2007 N MM-3-06/333@). On this moment The document contains data for the period from 2006 to 2015. And the spread of values ​​across industries is quite large: for 2015 - from 1.4% to 41.5%.

Tax burden indicators for specific taxes

Low level the burden for a specific tax (income tax, tax under the simplified tax system, etc.) may become a reason for selecting a taxpayer to the list of those whose activities are subject to review by the commission. Thus, the income tax burden is determined according to the income tax return as the ratio of the calculated tax to the amount of revenue and non-operating income, multiplied by 100%. If the obtained value is less than 3% (and for trade organizations - less than 1%), then the load level is considered low. This means that the company will be included in the “commission” list.

The tax burden for VAT is determined differently: as the ratio of the amount of VAT deductions for the previous 4 quarters to the amount of accrued VAT for the same period, multiplied by 100%. Here the load is considered low if the indicator value is 89% or more (

Articles on the topic